03 Jan 2019

Avoid These 3 Common TSMS Implementation Pitfalls

Do you face any of these symptoms with your TSMS:

  1. It does not add any benefit to the work you do
  2. You spend more time filling out paperwork than doing the actual work
  3. It does not reflect your work – the way you do it

If you answered YES to any of the above, then read ahead to see how QMII can assist you in simplifying your system to one that works for the inspector …. and YOU! 

Historically, 99% of towing vessels were never required to have a Certificate of Inspection (COI) commensurate with that of cargo ships, tankers and passenger vessels (including small passenger vessels).  All towing vessels are now required to be “in compliance with” the new inspection requirements when Sub Chapter M became effective July 20, 2018 (46 CFR 136.172).   Despite the new requirement, there are towing vessels that are not fully in compliance. 

In this age of Safety Management Systems, the working definition of “being in compliance” might best be thought of as having “documented evidence” of the requirements being in place (physically on the vessel) and being done hands-on (routine and emergency drills). Non-conformities must be documented.  Audits and other quality checks must have evidence.  Think of a cop show on TV where the detective says to the suspect, “I’ll believe the evidence.”

It stands to reason that the “evidence” has to be “Ready for Inspection” at the request of the Coast Guard.  The records and other documents that vessels need to have readily available are the heart of the matter in any Safety Management Program.  This has been the case with vessels that have been required to have a Document of Compliance issued by a classification society in accordance with International Safety Management.  The idea of an SMS is nothing new.  QMII experts have over 50 years of combined experience in helping regulated industries (afloat and ashore) pass their inspections. 

More importantly, QMII has experience in implementing management systems that work for the organization. Why spend money implementing a system for the inspector/auditor and get no benefit out of it? Sure, it is easy to take a template (easily available on the internet) and fill in the blanks to have a ‘compliant’ system. However, the common pitfalls with this are the same as those faced during the early years of ISM Code implementation:

  1. Overly documented management systems – Perhaps you do not need some of the procedures in the template given the nature of your work. Perhaps you already have existing documentation that meets the requirement.
  2. Lack of buy-in of personnel – This is because personnel has not been explained the benefits of having a TSMS in place. The question “What’s in it for me?’ must be answered.
  3. Template system – These are systems built of a template that do not meet the requirements of the organization or reflect the “as-is” of what they do.

At the end of the day, the shortcomings always fall on the shoulders of the “Industry Afloat.”  Take, for instance, the lack-of-communications syndrome.  We cannot overemphasize the idea of clear communication between these three stakeholders, the CG OCMI, the vessel owner (or managing operator) and the TPO.   

Based on our experience, QMII is committed to working with the maritime industry, so that we can help the industry segment that is regulated by the sub-chapter.   

 

2 thoughts on “Avoid These 3 Common TSMS Implementation Pitfalls”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *