How Management System Standards Help Small Businesses Scale

Businesswoman wearing earphones when watching presentation on tablet computer

 today’s competitive landscape, structured growth is not just an advantage for small businesses—it’s a necessity. Without a clear framework, businesses risk chaotic expansion, inconsistent quality, and missed opportunities. This is where Management System Standards (MSS) come into play. Standards like ISO 9001, ISO 14001, and ISO 45001 provide small businesses with the structure needed to scale sustainably and confidently. Their structure also allows the flexibility needed to allow the small businesses to be agile and adapt.

Over my 25+ years working within the maritime industry and supporting businesses, startups, and service organizations, I have seen firsthand how implementing process based standards such as ISO standards for small business transforms not just operations but also mindsets. Whether it’s a marine engineering firm or a boutique consulting firm, Management System Standards lay the foundation for scalable success.

What Are Management System Standards?

Management System Standards (MSS) are structured frameworks that help organizations manage and improve their processes, ensure quality, meet regulatory requirements, and achieve strategic objectives. These business management standards provide a “blueprint” for how to run your business more effectively.

Some well-known examples include:

  • ISO 9001: Focused on delivering consistent Quality
  • ISO 14001: Focused on improving Environmental performance
  • ISO 45001: Focused on Occupational Health and Safety 
  • ISO 27001: Focused on Information Security 

By adopting Management System Standards like ISO 9001, ISO 14001, ISO 27001 and ISO 45001, small businesses can create an operational backbone that supports consistent delivery, sustainable practices, and workplace safety. They become more resilient, adaptable, and attractive to clients, providing a strong competitive advantage in crowded markets.

Key Benefits of Implementing Management System Standards

Improved Operational Efficiency

When I helped a small manufacturing company, providing parts to a large shipyard, implement ISO 9001, their operational bottlenecks became immediately visible. By mapping processes and applying continuous improvement practices, they reduced their non-conforming outputs by 25% within a year. They also retained the business of the shipyard and grew to win more contracts. Management System Standards encourage clarity in workflows, reduced waste, and smarter resource use—essential factors if you’re looking to improve business operations.

A great real-world example is the case of Precision Micro Ltd., a UK-based manufacturer that reported a 15% productivity boost after ISO 9001 implementation, according to the British Assessment Bureau. Their streamlined processes directly contributed to significant cost savings and faster turnaround times.

Enhanced Customer Satisfaction

Clients notice consistency. They notice responsiveness. MSS like ISO 9001 place a sharp focus on customer feedback loops and satisfaction monitoring. Working with a credentialing provider, we were able to reduce the time it took to produce credentials from 4 months to less than a month. Happy customers mean repeat business and glowing referrals—a prime example of the benefits of ISO 9001.

Similarly, The Italian Food Company, a small deli supplier, increased their customer base by 20% after achieving ISO 9001 certification. They attributed their success to improved product consistency and faster complaint resolution, showcasing how ISO standards can directly impact business growth.

Better Compliance and Risk Management

Navigating environmental and safety regulations can overwhelm small teams. ISO 14001 and ISO 45001 help businesses manage compliance proactively. By systematizing risk assessments, my maritime clients could avoid regulatory penalties and significantly improve workplace safety. These standards also engage the leadership in the system and place more accountability on them for the effectiveness of the system. These strategies showcase how crucial risk management for small business is to sustainable growth.

The case of Skyform Ltd., a Scottish construction company, is notable—they reported a 70% reduction in workplace incidents after implementing ISO 45001. Additionally, they saw a notable increase in contract awards, thanks to their enhanced safety credentials.

How Management System Standards Enable Small Business Growth

Building Trust and Credibility

Certifications like ISO 9001 signal professionalism to clients and partners. It’s a game-changer for credibility. QMII has supported hundreds of clients in achieving first time certification including a government contractor that then won a major contract largely because their ISO 9001 certification assured the client of their reliability. This is a clear example of how to scale small business operations effectively.

According to research by ISO.org, organizations that are ISO 9001 certified are 54% more likely to achieve successful contract bids compared to their non-certified counterparts.

Streamlining Internal Processes

Clear documentation, responsibility assignments, and continuous improvement loops lead to a leaner, more agile operation. Internal teams spend less time firefighting and more time delivering value, supporting smart business growth strategies. For example, Advanced Engineering Ltd. reduced their internal quality issues by 40% after implementing ISO 9001, creating more time and resources for strategic initiatives.

Access to Bigger Markets

Many government agencies and corporate giants require small businesses to have specific certifications before awarding contracts. MSS opens doors to new revenue streams. Small business certifications like these are often the ticket to playing in larger arenas.

Research from the International Accreditation Forum (IAF) found that certified companies are 62% more likely to enter new markets and expand their client base successfully.

Case Studies: Small Businesses That Scaled with MSS

  • BIZZY B Management Systems (South Africa):
    After achieving ISO 9001 certification, Bizzy B saw a 30% increase in business efficiency and a significant reduction in client complaints. According to the South African Bureau of Standards (SABS), their improved processes helped them win several new contracts with government agencies.
  • Premier Foods Ltd (UK):
    According to BSI Group, Premier Foods implemented ISO 9001 to tighten quality controls across their supply chain. This led to a notable 20% reduction in customer complaints and supported their expansion into new international markets.
  • TNT Express (Italy):
    TNT Express leveraged ISO 9001 certification to streamline its logistics and customer service processes. ISO reported that after implementation, TNT Express improved on-time delivery rates by 18% and reduced operational errors, giving them a significant competitive advantage.

How to Get Started With Management System Standards

Step 1: Gap Analysis

Identify where your current processes fall short of standard requirements. This initial assessment prevents wasted effort later and is the critical first step in how to get ISO certification. Contact the QMII solutions team to learn how our Gap Assessment can set your system up for success. Grounded in a tailored approach that appreciates your existing management system, the QMII approach delivers maximum benefits with minimal change.

Step 2: Implementation

Develop and roll out the necessary policies, procedures, and processes to align with the chosen Management System Standards. This includes documentation, assigning responsibilities, conducting internal audits, and embedding a culture of continual improvement. Use QMII’s Action Planning Checklist to guide you. 

Step 3: Training

Educate your team on the standards and why they matter. Everyone must be on the same page for successful adoption. QMII’s Awareness Leaders Training is a great starting point.

Step 4: Certification

Choose an accredited body to certify your system. Remember, certification isn’t just a one-time event; it’s a commitment to continual improvement. Following the correct ISO certification steps can set your small business up for long-term success.

Step 5: Maintenance

Post-certification, regular audits and reviews keep your systems sharp and aligned with your growth trajectory. Certification for small business initiatives is only as strong as their ongoing maintenance.

Importance of Professional Consultation: Partnering with experts, like QMII, can dramatically simplify this journey. We bring perspective, proven tools, and the experience to help you avoid common pitfalls and tailor your approach to your specific industry needs.

Conclusion

Scaling a small business requires more than ambition; it demands structure, consistency, and credibility. Management System Standards provide the scaffolding small businesses need to grow sustainably, improve operational efficiency, and access bigger markets.

Start simple: pick one standard that aligns with your immediate goals. Implement it well. Then build from there. Structured today, successful tomorrow!

The Role of Management Systems in the Tragic Collision Over the Potomac

by Dr. IJ Arora


A significant tragedy occurred in Washington D.C. on January 29, 2025, with the deadly collision between a U.S. military Black Hawk helicopter and a regional jet flying for American Airlines. The resulting crash caused the loss of 67 precious lives and pointed to a multilayered failure of safety mechanisms.

In a short article like this it is not my intent to explore the reasons for this event, and I have neither the expertise nor the authority to investigate, anyway. The U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) and other relevant agencies will do that in a most professional manner. However, I do have a degree of experience relating to the systems approach for managing processes at large and complex organizations. I feel called to share my perspective on this disaster with a systems approach in mind.

Proactive appreciation for risk

Hindsight, it has been said, is 20/20. I am aware that I’m writing this after the tragedy has already occurred. However, management systems should be proactive, where data drives the understanding and mitigation of risk. As a practitioner and advocate of process-based management systems, I believe that well-implemented procedures give an organization the best chance to produce conforming products and services.

A systems approach, based on ISO 9001’s subclause 4.4., which relates to quality management system processes, could have played a role in preventing an incident of this type. Subclause 4.4.1 states, in part, “The organization shall establish, implement, maintain and continually improve a quality management system, including the processes needed and their interactions….”

Following this requirement is no guarantee of safe and successful outcomes, but it is surely the best bet. I had similar thoughts on the tragedy of the implosion of the Titan submersible and the Baltimore Bridge collapse. The core principles of ISO 9001, especially risk-based thinking, continual improvement, and process interaction, align well with safety imperatives, particularly safety management for the aviation industry. The systems approach is a fundamental that organizations often neglect at their (and their customers’) peril.

ISO 9001—and for that matter, the aerospace standard AS9100—is built on risk-based thinking. A structured process aligned with the risk management standard ISO 31000 and aviation safety management systems are required by ISO 9001 subclause 6.1, regarding actions for addressing risks and opportunities, and subclause 8.1 concerning operation planning and controls. Conformance with these requirements can help identify and mitigate collision risks between civil and military aircraft.

Process interaction and communication are vital in such situations.  A failure in communication between air traffic control, military operations, and civilian aviation may have contributed to the crash. Of course, we will wait for the full report from the NTSB investigation. However, it is never too late (or for that matter, too early) to be proactive and implement a process approach to ensure that all stakeholders follow well-defined communication and coordination protocols.

PDCA, SWOT, and FMEA

Being proactive requires an appreciation of risk at the Plan stage of the Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) cycle. Note that preventive actions and continual improvement are integral to the system approach.

The media have reported on the details of numerous previous aviation incidents. Analyzing near-miss incidents and integrating lessons learned into improved procedures could enhance safety protocols. Human factors and process redundancy must be considered in a systematic manner. Human errors (e.g., miscommunication, misinterpretation of airspace usage, etc.) can be minimized with automated systems and via decision-making redundancy checks.

In principle, the process approach found in ISO 9001 emphasizes addressing process issues as opposed to blaming individuals. However, in the aviation field, the human factor is important; clause 10.2.1 b2 of AS9100 expresses the importance of this concept. The industry-specific interpretation of requirements as seen in this standard provides a robust framework (via a clause structure) to design an efficient management system. This, together with auditing and compliance requirements, gives leadership confidence that their system can and will produce conforming products and services.

Further to this point, regular audits of flight coordination between civilian and military aviation could highlight gaps before they lead to accidents. As such, integrating ISO 9001 with AS9100 and AS9110 (the aerospace quality standard specifically designed for maintenance, repair, and operations) as well as ISO 45001 covering the management of operational health and safety will provide a solution to proactively address risks in the context of the aviation industry. This would cover all interested parties, as per clauses 4.1 and 4.2 of ISO 9001. Although aviation already has strict regulatory frameworks (e.g., FAA, ICAO, etc.), the structured process management systems required by ISO 9001 and AS9100 can complement these frameworks by embedding the statutory and legal requirements into the management system.

If the organizations involved focus on how specific elements of ISO 9001 can be applied to aviation safety, particularly in preventing collisions, I would first recommend that they look at risk-based thinking as seen in clause 6.1, addressing actions related to risks and opportunities. This can partially be accomplished by undergoing a strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) analysis. ISO 9001 emphasizes risk assessment and mitigation throughout processes.

In aviation, a structured risk-based approach would identify potential hazards (e.g., conflicting flight paths, miscommunication, system failures, etc.). The system would also assess risk severity and likelihood of occurrence and probability of detection, using tools like a failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA). Controls could be implemented (e.g., enhanced air traffic control coordination, better radar tracking, AI-driven airspace monitoring, etc.). For example, aviation safety bodies could require all civilian and military flights to undergo a real-time risk assessment check before takeoff, considering airspace congestion, weather, and military training exercises.

Potential solutions

Process interaction and communication (as seen in ISO 9001’s clause 4.4.1 b regarding understanding process interactions) would systematically improve the system. Aviation operations involve multiple stakeholders, such as airlines, air traffic controllers, military operations, ground crews, etc. A process approach would ensure defined standard operating procedures for communication between civilian and military aviation. These could include real-time data sharing using standardized digital platforms and/or automated conflict-resolution systems that detect and alert pilots and controllers regarding possible mid-air conflicts. An integrated civil-military coordination dashboard could be established, where both parties have real-time visibility on flight plans, airspace restrictions, and emergency deviations.

Risk appreciation and continual improvement (as seen in ISO 9001’s clause 10.2 regarding nonconformity and corrective action, clause 10.3 on continual improvement, and clause 5.1.2 regarding customer focus) require organizations to analyze failures, investigate causes, and take corrective actions. In aviation safety, this could mean automated reporting and analysis of near-miss incidents and regular safety audits to evaluate procedural weaknesses and machine learning-based predictive analytics to foresee and prevent future crashes.

When a near-miss incident occurs, such a system could automatically trigger a root cause analysis and recommend safety adjustments for all stakeholders. Human factors and redundancy (as seen in clause 7.1.6 regarding organizational knowledge) promote knowledge management and human reliability strategies. In aviation, this could mean mandatory cross-training for military and commercial pilots on shared airspace procedures. AI-assisted decision-making tools that provide secondary verification for pilots and controllers could be a positive outcome of data analysis.

Data drives risk and trends. A digital co-pilot system could use AI to continuously monitor air traffic conflicts and intervene if human errors are detected. Auditing and compliance (as seen in clause 9.2 regarding internal auditing) would provide objective and independent inputs by regular safety audits of flight coordination. Air traffic control systems could ensure compliance with standardized airspace usage protocols, identification of gaps in inter-agency communication, and implementation of best practices from previous incident investigations. A shared civil-military aviation audit framework could ensure uniform compliance with risk management policies, reducing the chance of airspace conflicts.

I am not a technical subject matter expert in the aviation industry. My expertise is in looking at systems. My 30 years of experience suggests the importance of strengthening the Plan stage of the PDCA cycle. Things go wrong at the Do stage (i.e., implementation), however, if the plan itself is deficient and not coordinated, the implementation can and perhaps will go wrong.

By integrating ISO 9001 principles into aviation safety proactively and appreciating the risks, management can prevent mid-air conflicts. Process-driven coordination ensures better civil-military collaboration. Automated monitoring and auditing could improve response times to emerging threats.

Sadly, this tragedy once again bears out the wisdom of W. Edwards Deming when he said that a bad system will beat a good person every time.

Note – The above article was recently featured in Exemplar Global’s publication ‘The Auditor”. Click here to read it.

Can Boeing Deliver a Long-Term Solution to their 737 MAX Problems?

Dr. IJ Arora

Boeing is in the spotlight again with its 737 MAX planes, which have already had a deeply troubled history. Customer focus (which is clause 5.1.2 of ISO 9001 and AS9100) seems to have been lost somewhere.

I have read several recent articles on these incidents as well as Peter Robison’s book Flying Blind: The 737 MAX Tragedy and the Fall of Boeing, all of which point to a worsening situation for Boeing. The public perception of this great American company, which has always been committed to top-class engineering and trusted products, is changing from one of respect to one of caution. Travelers are wondering, “Should I fly in a 737 MAX?”

Boeing and the aerospace industry in general have high standards for quality and product safety. In this article, I postulate whether a company’s quality management system can guarantee that nothing goes wrong for customers. Can it ensure perfection? If not, what are the alternatives—and why have one at all?

What happened and who is responsible?

For those not familiar with the 737 MAX incident in January, shortly after an Alaska Airlines flight departed from Portland, Oregon, a cabin door panel blew off. As investigations are still ongoing the causes have not yet been fully determined. Boeing also had a software issue on the 737 MAX, resulting in the crash of a Lion Air flight in 2018 and an Ethiopian Airways flight in 2019.

Here in the United States, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) plays a critical role in providing regulations to ensure flight safety, and also provides oversight of aircraft manufacturers, airports, and maintenance providers. In the case of the Alaska Airlines flight, it seems that the FAA failed to uphold its trusted role. The FAA’s numerous checks and balances, most of which are intended to focus on customer safety, were like aligning holes in slices of Swiss cheese. It will be interesting to see what changes this incident brings about at the FAA. Then again, can regulatory oversight guarantee safety of flight?

The AS9100 standard, which is specific to the aerospace industry, isn’t the brainchild of a single entity, but rather a collaborative effort driven by two key players:

  1. The International Aerospace Quality Group (IAQG). This international organization brings together representatives from aviation, space, and defense companies across the Americas, Asia/Pacific, and Europe. They actively participate in developing, maintaining, and updating the AS9100 standard.
  2. Standardization organizations. These bodies, such as the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) in the Americas and the European Association of Aerospace Industries (now the AeroSpace and Defence Industries Association of Europe), officially publish and distribute the standard.

It is important to note that AS9100 builds upon the foundation of the more general ISO 9001 quality management system standard. While ISO 9001 lays the basic framework, the IAQG adds industry-specific requirements crucial for ensuring safety and quality in the aerospace domain.

In addition to the manufacturer and the FAA, the owner/lessor of the aircraft also plays a role in ensuring the plane is properly maintained. This includes selecting a competent maintenance provider, hiring competent engineers, and having robust processes in place. With so many different stakeholders, can blame be attributed to just one when accidents happen? Furthermore, should blame be the name of the game? Perhaps not! It is important to note that the system is implemented to support each user and that all stakeholders in the value chain play their part as well.

Audits, inspections, and management systems: Are these the solution?

Behind every tragedy, casualty, and mishap is a chain of related events. The immediate suspect when these types of critical failures occur are poor inspection protocols, perhaps even the dreaded “human error.” However, this may be the low-hanging fruit and a deeper dive may identify other causal factors, such as asking if the quality audit failed.

What is the difference between an audit and an inspection? Can they replace each other or are inspections alone enough? The simple answer is no! Both are needed due to fundamental differences in approach. Audits look at the processes to ensure the management system produces conforming products and services. An efficient management system must include the following, to name a few:

  • It must be well-defined, starting with the “as-is” state of the system.
  • Risks must be identified (clause 6.1) based on the context of the organization (clauses 4.1 and 4.2).
  • A clear definition of the product must be identified.
  • Effective audits and periodic review must be undertaken by management.
  • Outsourced processes must be controlled.

Inspections play an important role by identifying defects prior to release, thus protecting not only the client/customer/user/warfighter, etc., but also the reputation of the organization itself. With that said, inspections don’t contribute to continual improvement because they focus on fixes as opposed to long-term solutions. In effect, they do not really add value since the organization has already incurred the cost of producing the defective part or product. The creators of the Toyota Production System (i.e., lean) came up with the Andon process to catch a defect as early in the process as possible so as to fix it before the problem went too far down the line.

Management systems are not just a collection of documents. To function properly, they require commitment at all levels of the organization, including top management providing the needed resources. It takes time to build a culture of quality in which shortcuts are avoided and there is no fear of speaking up. Customer focus must not be compromised. For example, release of conforming product should go through the process specifically called out by clause 8.6; any interference by top management to truncate this process would imply the loss of customer focus. Is this a possibility? Perhaps, but the investigation must reveal the truth. In this case of the Alaska Air incident both the Boeing customers and Boeing as a company have suffered. It is my hope that investigators will identify all failed parts of the system from each responsible party. These may include not only failed inspections, but also suboptimal processes. This could end up taking us back to an inadequate quality management system.

Quality management systems: Can they deliver?

Given the above, can a properly designed and well-audited management system (supported by good inspection techniques to help ensure conforming product) guarantee that nothing goes wrong with an organization’s output? My opinion is that no one can guarantee this completely. However, risk can certainly be greatly reduced when everything is implemented well. This includes the training of personnel, which correlates strongly to competence; unfortunately, this is often the first budget to get cut when resources are scarce.

When high-visibility incidents like these occur, it may be forgotten that airplanes remain the statistically safest mode of travel on earth. This is primarily due to robust quality management systems, well-adopted regulatory frameworks, and regular oversight. Humans play an important role in the success of the management system, from the commitment at the top to the buy-in by the workforce (clause 5 to clauses 7.1.3, 7.1.4, and 10.3). Taken together, this helps create an environment where quality can flourish within the organization.

Boeing may be doing a lot correctly, and yet the results could be unacceptable depending on the performance of outsourced processes (clauses 8.41/8.4.2/8.4.3). After all, the fuselages for the 737 MAX are made by Spirit AeroSystems Holdings Inc. Spirit AeroSystems is located in Wichita, Kansas; once these fuselages are manufactured, they are shipped by rail to Boeing’s facility in Renton, Washington. Therefore, not only is a major component of the 737 MAX outsourced, but the shipping and preservation of product (clause 8.5.4) also could contribute to the product’s nonconformity. Overall, Boeing remains responsible for the entire supply chain (clause 4.3), with their obligation to “ensure conformity of its products and services and the enhancement of customer satisfaction.”

Even with a solid quality management system in place, this or similar failures can occur. There is no way to assure the public of 100-percent performing (i.e., perfect) output. The fear in the minds of air travelers is valid and will remain so until an exhaustive root cause analysis of this issue is performed and those root causes are resolved. The current events beg the question: Did Boeing improve their management system after the Ethiopian Airlines 737 MAX crash? If they had bent to the oars and gone deep into their review to uncover and permanently fix the holes in their management system, this event may never have occurred. Surface corrections, or what some organizations call “fix -it” solutions, only remove the symptoms. The root causes must be addressed and resolved (clause 10.2.1). There are no shortcuts to quality.

In conclusion

It has taken years for air travelers to feel safe and unconcerned about air safety. I travel a lot internationally, and often pick an airline based on their service and comfort, but now I (as well as the broader public, I would imagine) need to consider which aircraft will transport us. It is a new fear about product safety that has its genesis in Boeing not operating its management system efficiently and losing customer focus. The worst is the erosion of public confidence in federal oversight and its intent to keep the customer safe.

I have spent my life studying similar complex problems and leading teams in helping organizations find long-term sustainable solutions. This requires bold and dynamic leadership (clauses 5.3 and 5.1) for leaders to plan and implement change. Appreciating and accepting risks (i.e., keeping the customer in focus) and moving forward is integral to true leadership. Ethics is still not a clause of ISO 9001 and AS9100, but ethical leadership is about doing the correct thing for all stakeholders.

In seminars at which I present, I often ask senior managers: “If you have a choice between following the procedure and/or doing the correct thing, what would you do as a leader?” The answer—I hope—is to do the correct thing at all times. But then, hope is not a plan. Air safety cannot be based on hope and faith. Boeing needs the leadership to redesign their system if they are to bring the public trust back for this great American company.

Hyperlink to the thing characteristic in Exemplar International e-newsletter – “The Auditor”

AS9100 Lead Auditor Training: A blog about how to become a lead auditor

REGISTER NOW!

Are you looking to take your auditing skills to the next level and become a lead auditor? If so, AS9100 lead auditor training may be just what you need. This comprehensive certification program is designed for professionals who want to specialize in aerospace quality management systems auditing. In this blog post, we'll explore what exactly AS9100 lead auditor training is, what it means to be a Lead Auditor in this industry, and the steps required to obtain this coveted certification. So buckle up and get ready for an exciting journey into the world of AS9100 lead auditor training!

What is AS9100 Lead Auditor Training?

AS9100 Lead Auditor Training is a quality management system standard specifically designed for the aerospace industry. It was created by the International Aerospace Quality Group (IAQG) to address the unique challenges faced by organizations in this field.

The AS9100 standard builds upon ISO 9001, but also includes additional requirements that are specific to the aerospace sector. These include things like product safety, configuration management, and risk management.

Implementing AS9100 lead auditor training can help organizations ensure that their products and services meet or exceed customer expectations, while also complying with regulatory requirements. It can also help them improve their operational efficiency and reduce costs through better processes and procedures.

Achieving AS9100 lead auditor training certification is a significant achievement for any organization operating in the aerospace industry. It demonstrates a commitment to quality excellence and provides assurance to customers that they are working with a trustworthy partner.

What is a Lead Auditor?

A Lead Auditor is a professional who has the expertise to conduct audits of management systems based on international standards. In the aerospace industry, AS9100 is the standard that specifies requirements for quality and safety management systems. A Lead Auditor plays a vital role in ensuring compliance with these standards.

To become a Lead Auditor, one must have extensive knowledge of the AS9100 standard and its requirements. They should possess advanced auditing skills and be able to lead an audit team effectively. Typically, individuals who aspire to become Lead Auditors undergo rigorous training programs to develop their competencies.

During an audit, a Lead Auditor evaluates whether an organization's processes conform to the requirements laid out by AS9100. They analyze data gathered during an audit to identify any process gaps or areas of non-conformance that need improvement.

The role requires excellent communication skills as they are responsible for reporting findings back to senior management or clients while making recommendations for corrective actions where necessary.

Becoming a certified Lead Auditor is essential in ensuring that organizations meet international standards and provide high-quality products or services while maintaining compliance with regulations in their respective industries.

The steps to become a AS9100 Lead Auditor

Becoming a Lead Auditor for AS9100 requires dedication and hard work. Here are the steps you need to take to become one:

1. Gain Knowledge: Before becoming an auditor, you should have knowledge of the AS9100 standard, its requirements, and underlying principles. You can gain this through training or experience.

2. Attend Training: To become a Lead Auditor for AS9100, you must attend an accredited training course that covers the standard's requirements and audit techniques.

3. Gain Experience: After completing your training, it is important to get practical experience in auditing processes related to aviation, space, and defense industries.

4. Become a Certified Internal Auditor: The next step towards becoming a Lead Auditor is to become certified as an internal auditor by demonstrating your understanding of the auditing process.

5. Apply for Certification: Once you have completed all necessary requirements including education/training hours and practical experience hours in auditing aviation/space/defense-related industries; submit your application for certification at any authorized body after passing required exams

These steps will help anyone who wishes to become an AS9100 Lead Auditor succeed in their pursuit while ensuring they meet all necessary qualifications along the way.

The benefits of becoming a AS9100 Lead Auditor

Becoming an AS9100 Lead Auditor comes with many benefits, both professionally and personally. First and foremost, lead auditors are highly sought after in the aerospace industry due to their expertise in quality management systems. This translates into a wider range of job opportunities and potentially higher salaries.

Moreover, by becoming a lead auditor, you develop strong analytical skills that will help you identify areas for improvement within organizations. You'll be able to provide valuable insights on how to optimize processes and improve efficiency.

Additionally, working as a lead auditor requires excellent communication skills since it involves conducting audits and providing feedback to stakeholders at all levels of the organization. This can help improve your overall communication abilities which is beneficial not only for work but also personal relationships.

Obtaining certification as an AS9100 Lead Auditor demonstrates your commitment to continuous learning and professional development. It's evidence that you strive towards being the best in your field which can further enhance your reputation among clients or employers alike.

There are numerous advantages associated with being an AS9100 Lead Auditor including career advancement opportunities, enhanced analytical skills, improved communication abilities as well as demonstrating one's dedication towards ongoing personal growth.

How to maintain your Lead Auditor certification

Maintaining your Lead Auditor certification is crucial to ensure that you are up-to-date with the latest industry standards and regulations. Here are some tips on how to maintain your certification:

Continued Education: One of the best ways to keep yourself up-to-date is by attending training programs, seminars, and conferences related to AS9100. This will help you gain a deeper understanding of the requirements and make sure that you're following them.

Professional Experience: Continuously working as a lead auditor helps you stay updated on all aspects of auditing procedures in your line of work. It also gives you an opportunity for continuous improvement while conducting audits.

Internal Auditing: You can offer internal auditing services within your organization or take part in them if there are any opportunities available. Internal auditing provides hands-on experience in various areas such as risk management, quality control systems, corrective actions etc., providing more value-added insights for future external audits.

Networking Opportunities: Connecting with other auditors within related industries can be beneficial for sharing knowledge and experiences which leads to new ideas about how best practices can be improved upon over time

By taking these steps towards maintaining their certification status, professionals demonstrate their commitment towards staying relevant in their profession while ensuring continued growth throughout their careers as professional auditors.

Conclusion

Becoming a lead auditor is a significant achievement in the quality management field, and obtaining AS9100 lead auditor training can help you reach your career goals. By following the steps outlined in this blog post, you can start on the path to becoming an expert in auditing aerospace organizations' quality management systems.

Remember that being a lead auditor requires extensive knowledge of industry standards, advanced auditing techniques, and excellent communication skills. Continuous learning and experience are necessary to maintain your certification as well.

If you're looking for professional development opportunities or seeking new career prospects within the aerospace industry, consider pursuing AS9100 Lead Auditor training today!

REGISTER NOW!

Why AS9100 Lead Auditor Training is Essential for Aerospace Industry Success?

REGISTER NOW!

Ready for takeoff? If you're looking to soar high in the aerospace industry, then As9100 Lead Auditor Training is a must-have. This specialized training program ensures that you have the skills and knowledge needed to navigate complex quality management systems and maintain compliance with industry standards. So buckle up and join us as we explore why As9100 Lead Auditor Training is essential for achieving success in this rapidly-evolving field. From boosting your career prospects to enhancing safety measures, get ready to discover all the ways this training can help you reach new heights!

Introduction to AS9100 Lead Auditor Training

AS9100 lead auditor training is essential for aerospace industry success because it provides the knowledge and skills necessary to effectively audit an organization's quality management system. The training covers all aspects of the AS9100 standard, including its requirements, structure, and implementation. Additionally, the course teaches participants how to plan and conduct audits in accordance with international standards.

Benefits of AS9100 Lead Auditor Training

AS9100 Lead Auditor training provides a number of benefits for those working in the aerospace industry. The training helps individuals to develop the skills and knowledge necessary to effectively audit an aerospace quality management system. Additionally, the training provides individuals with an understanding of the requirements of AS9100 and how to apply them to an aerospace organization. The training helps participants learn how to effectively communicate with auditees and understand their needs.

What is QMII?

As the aerospace industry grows and becomes more complex, the need for qualified lead auditors who can ensure compliance with quality management system (QMS) requirements becomes more important. QMII is a comprehensive lead auditor training course that covers all aspects of auditing a QMS. The course is designed to give participants the skills and knowledge necessary to audit a QMS in accordance with international standards. It covers topics such as how to plan and conduct an audit, how to report on findings, and how to follow up on corrective actions. After completing the course, participants will be able to confidently lead audits of aerospace suppliers and other organizations.

Advantages of QMII’s as9100 Lead Auditor Training

QMII’s as9100 Lead Auditor Training provides a number of advantages for those looking to improve their aerospace industry credentials. The course is designed to give participants the skills and knowledge necessary to become a lead auditor for the as9100 Quality Management System. The as9100 standard is the international quality management system standard specifically for the aerospace industry. Lead auditors are responsible for assessing an organization’s compliance with the requirements of the as9100 standard. They perform audits to ensure that an organization’s quality management system is effective and compliant with all relevant regulations. Lead auditors must have a detailed understanding of the as9100 standard and be able to identify non-conformities within an organization’s quality management system. QMII’s as9100 Lead Auditor Training course is conducted over five days and includes both classroom-based instruction and practical hands-on experience. The course covers all aspects of the as9100 standard and provides participants with the skills and knowledge necessary to successfully audit an organization’s compliance with the standard. The advantages of QMII’s as9100 Lead Auditor Training include: - Detailed coverage of the requirements of the as9100 standard - Practical experience in conducting audits - Opportunity to assess an organization’s compliance with the as9100 standard - Skills and knowledge necessary to become a lead auditor for the as9100 Quality

10 Crucial Advantages of As9100 Lead Auditor Training

There are several reasons why As9100 lead auditor training is essential for aerospace industry success. First and foremost, it provides individuals with the knowledge and skills necessary to effectively audit an aerospace organization. The training covers all aspects of the AS9100 standard, including its requirements, methods, and tools. Additionally, the training covers how to properly plan and conduct an audit, as well as how to report on findings. Second, As9100 lead auditor training helps to ensure that individuals possess the necessary skills to assess an organization's compliance with the AS9100 standard. In particular, the training covers how to identify non-conformities and make recommendations for corrective action. Additionally, the training helps participants understand the importance of maintaining objectivity during an audit and ensuring that their personal biases do not influence their judgments. Third, As9100 lead auditor training helps participants develop a deep understanding of the aerospace industry and its unique challenges. The training covers topics such as aviation regulations, quality management systems, aircraft design and manufacturing processes, and supply chain management. Additionally, the training helps participants gain an appreciation for the impact that their work can have on safety-critical systems. Fourth, As9100 lead auditor training prepares individuals to take on more responsibility within their organizations. The training helps participants understand what is expected of them in terms of conducting audits and reporting on findings. Additionally, the training equips individuals with the skills needed to provide leadership and direction to other members of their audit teams

Conclusion

AS9100 lead auditor training is an essential part of the aerospace industry’s success. It helps ensure that all operations within the industry are conducted safely and in accordance with international standards for quality management. Not only does this provide confidence to customers in the quality of products produced, but it also ensures that the aerospace industry remains competitive on a global scale. By taking advantage of as9100 lead auditor training, aerospace professionals can ensure their organization’s success and stay ahead of their competition.

REGISTER NOW!

AS 9100 – Getting Employee Engagement in the System

AS 9100 aerospace quality management systems enable organizations a framework for using a process-based approach to meeting customer requirements. AS 9100 in clause 5.1.1h requires the leadership to show their commitment to the system by “engaging, directing, and supporting persons to contribute to the effectiveness of the quality management system.” Further clause 7.3 asks organizations to ensure that those working under their control are aware of their contributions to the effectiveness of the system, to product safety, product conformity and the need for ethical behavior. Many organizations struggle to get employee buy-in to the system. Some organizations reward best teams and performers but how do we get intrinsic involvement and buy-in from all. This article discusses some steps that companies can take to encourage intrinsic employee involvement in the system. 

Setting Challenging Objectives 

AS 9100 asks organizations to set objectives at relevant functions, levels and processes. When setting objectives, QMII encourages organizations to set objectives for each process/procedure. These can further be broken down into smaller goals for individual process team members. The objectives must flow from the policy so in doing their work to achieve the goals it is clear to the employee on how they impact the customer. The objectives when too easy do not encourage improvement or motivate the workforce. When too challenging affect morale as the goals/objectives are never reached. Review the objectives at periodic intervals to monitor progress and readjust as necessary.  

Management Involvement 

The workforce is more willing to pitch in when they see the leader pitching in. This must be something they do often rather than once in a while. The workforce must get representation at meetings on quality. This may be in the form of their suggestions for improvement being presented to the management at the management review and then receiving feedback on their suggestions rather than never knowing what happened. Management may choose to present to the workforce on a monthly or quarterly basis on the state of the system so the workforce knows where the organization stands and where it is heading. The workforce must feel like the part of a team and a valued team member. Only then will they willingly contribute. 

Customer Focus 

Often each worker may not know who the end customer is or get to see the end product in use and how the product benefits customers and their business and further end users. Organizations must make known to the users who the end customer is, share positive feedback received from customers, accolades received by the company and perhaps even arrange to see the end product in use.  

Personal Development 

Investing in personnel is a great way for an organization to show the workforce that they care. That you are willing to invest in them because they invest so much in what they do. Consider AS 9100 training for your workforce. It will also better help them understand why they do what they do. QMII offers a number of different training formats for AS 9100, including an overview, internal auditor and lead auditor format.  

 

Why pursue AS9100 certification

What is AS9100?

In the aerospace industry, a small error in the supply chain can have catastrophic consequences.  AS9100 was developed to manage the extensive global supply chain of aerospace manufacturers and to ensure that each is implementing an effective quality management system.  AS9100 is based on the framework of ISO 9001 and follows the same high-level structure.  A company conforming to the requirements of AS9100 also meets the requirements of ISO 9001.

AS9100 certification  provides third party validation of the processes an organization has put in place to manage the quality of the product/service they deliver. It can also provide confidence to customers that the organization adheres to the highest standards of quality and safety.

Is AS9100 certification mandatory?

AS9100 and ISO 9001 allow organizations to self-declare conformance.  However, if you are looking to do business in the aerospace industry AS9100 certification is practically mandatory.

AS9100 and ISO 9001 allow organizations to self-declare conformance.  However, if you are looking to do business in the aerospace industry AS9100 certification is practically mandatory.  For a company to be listed on the OASIS supplier database, it will need to have AS9100 certification.  Companies not registered with the OASIS supplier database will have trouble doing any business in the aerospace sector. 

Is it worth it?   

AS9100 certification  comes at a cost, of course.  There are recurring costs as recertification occurs every 3 years and there are annual surveillance audits conducted in the intermediate years.  Developing and maintaining the system will require resources including training time and time spent on improving processes. 

In addition to being listed with OASIS, meeting the requirements of ISO 9001 and AS9100 provides other benefits.  One of these is the creation of feedback loops for communicating and implementing opportunities for improvement.  Another is that it ensures non-conformities are addressed and that effective corrective action is taken.  In addition, it ensures that management remains more involved in the system and that quality is integral to the management system. 

What about audits? 

While AS9100 certification may reduce the possibility or frequency of a supplier audit, it does not imply that an organization will not get audited.  Supplier audits look at an organization’s compliance to supplier requirements as well as the AS9100 standard.  Certification to AS9100 also does not reduce the internal checks required by the company.  AS9100 certification audits will not go to the same depths that internal audits can, which is why internal audits are vital to the success of the system. 

An organization looking to do business in the aerospace industry will need to consider AS9100 certification when implementing a system.  Care must be taken in the system implementation not to use a one size fits all template and to make the effort to build a strong management system that will deliver benefits beyond just the certificate on the wall. 

Who should do the PEAR in AS9110

AS9110 Process Effectiveness Assessment Reports are used to identify the effectiveness of a process. PEAR was developed to allow audit personnel to systematically evaluate the effectiveness of a process as performed by the organization. It takes the inputs, outputs, actual steps of the process and recourses and controls in account.

Turtle diagrams are often sued to depict PEARs. The PEARs are a tool to be completed by the auditor in their assessment of the AS9110 system. It is however beneficial to have the process owner complete one as this gives the process owner a good indication of how well their process is working and where, if any, improvements may be made. Often to ease the process for the auditor the internal quality manager will complete the PEARs and keep them prepared for the auditors. It is however not the role of the quality manager to do this and nor does it enable any improvement.

AS9110 asks organizations to conduct internal audits to assess the effectiveness of the processes and system. However, QMII at times finds that the audits are limited to determining conformity only. The PEARs come in handy here by enable a process-based audits and allows for due diligence to be done by the auditor. To identity that the resources and controls assigned are adequate to ensure that conforming inputs deliver conforming outputs while meeting the effectiveness goals of the organization through monitoring and measurement.

So how many PEARs do we need? The organization will need one for every key process it identifies within it system and this can run up to 15 to 20 at times depending on the size of the organization and perhaps even more. There is no preset minimal number of PEAR’s required from an audit. When an auditor is assessing effectiveness, the auditor is essentially measuring how well the organization does this. What metrics are they monitoring to know whether they are meeting objectives or not. What did they take into consideration in setting their objectives e.g., customer requirements, legal requirements etc.

The organization is then scored by the AS9110 auditor based on the guidelines provided in AS9101. AS9101 provides a Process Effectiveness Matrix that scores the organization across two axes. The first being process realization – the extent to which planned activities are realized and the second – process results – the extent to which planned results are achieved. Based on this scoring the lowest grade sates “(a) The process is not defined, implemented, and planned activities not realized, and (b) The process is not delivering the planned results and appropriate action is not being taken.” The highest score equates to “(a) The process is defined, implemented, and planned activities fully realized, and (b) The process is delivering the planned results.

How AS9100 prevent airline accidents

It is said that air travel is statistically one of the safest modes of transportation. The flights that do not land well or go missing make the news more than the 1000’s of those that complete a safe flight. Checklists used in the aviation industry are infamous for how well they assist pilots deal with disasters. However, a lot is to be said for the plane itself, which is built to stringent quality requirements, down to the last rivet. Many aerospace parts manufacturers are certified for AS9100. So, what is AS9100?
It is an internationally accepted standard that defines the requirements for a quality management system for companies. It is built on the foundation of ISO 9001, another globally recognized quality standard. It builds the framework for organizations to identify risks at all stages of the production or service realizations process. The standard sets the baseline for quality and once implemented within an organization is assessed and certified by independent accreditation bodies. So, a part produced by an AS9100 certified organization in India, Brazil or elsewhere will meet the basic quality requirements.
What is AS9100 prescribing that companies do to achieve this? As9100 is not prescriptive in its requirements. It defines the framework, and each company must then interpret the requirements as they best apply to what they do. The leadership of the organization must remain involved and is accountable for the effectiveness of the system. The systems are influenced by regulatory requirements, customer requirements and other business requirements as from various stakeholders. What is AS9100 requirements with respect to control of outsourced processes.
Organizations must control outsourced processes and remain responsible for the output of the process. Based on the performance of the vendor of the criticality of the parts etc., the type and extent of control may vary. AS9100 also requires organizations to determine the competence of personnel needed and then to take steps to achieve this competence. As9100 quality requirements must be flowed down to all suppliers in the supply chain and supply chain risks are to be considered and mitigated as appropriate.
What is AS9100 requirements for audits. External certification audits are conducted on a three-year cycle with annual surveillance audits in the intermediate years. Internal audit frequency is determined and based on the organization needs and the auditors used to conduct the audits must be competent. To achieve this competence, they should compete a certified AS9100 lead auditor training. QMII offers a PROBITAS Authentication lead auditor training in both virtual and on-site format. These stringent quality requirements in the supply chain as advocated by AS9100 help ensure planes meet the highest safety and quality requirements. Thus helping to reduce accidents.

AS9100-Risk-Based Thinking in the Airline industry – It’s about time.

The airline industry statistically has one of the best safest records. AS9100 defines the framework for a quality management system for aerospace parts manufacturers across the globe. Over the past decade there have been several airline accidents however, that have brought the safety of airlines to the forefront. In a most recent case of the Boeing 737-max a software glitch was identified as the cause. As investigations proceed the general consensus is that this glitch should have been previously identified.

Risk generally is associated with ‘uncertainty’ or ‘negativity’. This changed with ISO 9001:2015 and the onset of risk-based thinking that now asks companies to consider the opportunities for improvement that may arise out of taking a ‘calculated’ risk. Further in AS9100, that is built on ISO 9001, there are requirements for consideration of strategic risks and operational risks and the need to take action to address each. The impact of coronavirus or a similar pandemic is a great example of a strategic risk that can affect business continuity.

Risk-based thinking in the AS9100 standard promotes customer focus within an organization. While risk-based thinking has been inherent in previous versions of the standard with preventive action, the new standards address risk at each stage of the PDCA cycle thus enabling the entire As9100 management system at each stage as a preventive tool.

The aerospace and automotive industry are leaders in the implementation of Failure mode and effects Analysis (FMEA) and the Plan-Do-Check-Act Cycle (PDCA) of process management.  Originally adopted by the military in the 1950’s, FMEA later was embraced by the auto and aerospace industries.  The FMEA process identifies risks that can then be addressed using mistake proofing and problem solving with a team approach.  FMEA can be used for either product or process. When used properly it can be a very effective at addressing risks. FMEA is a great core tool that can be applied to address the AS9100 clause 8.1.1 operational risk requirements.

AS9100 asks top management to take accountability for the quality of products and services produced by their organization; keeping a customer focus at the core of all they do.  The influence of end users, customers and the companies marketing department on the product’s design needs to be constantly reviewed. At each stage of the requirements gathering, design & development and manufacturing stages of the AS9100 system there are potential risks. As such doing a single FMEA may not be sufficient but may require a review of the FMEA at periodic intervals as a change in inputs to the process/product may change the associated risks or identify new ones.

Management wants to encourage continuous improvement and innovative recommendations by all stakeholders, but changes must be reviewed.  Whenever a change is made to a AS9100 certified product or service, that change should follow the PDCA Cycle approach, the same way it was done when the product was first introduced.  This will reduce the number of recalls, and the risk of injuries to end users of the products.

A single non-conforming product that goes out of the organization into the market results in an intangible loss for no value can be put on the loss of reputation. It only takes a single incident! Starting with risk appreciation at the Plan stage of the PDCA cycle and then throughout the rest of the cycle, with a focus on customer satisfaction, will help the aerospace industry improve by preventing non-conformities before they occur as well as hopefully, improve their As9100 certified products.